Godzilla (1998)'s comments
Login
or
Sign Up
!
Go
Sign up
Movie charts
Profile charts
Check
Mark movie as favorite
Dislike this movie
Add movie to watchlist
Mark movie as owned
Check movie
View the official lists that include Godzilla
Visit IMDb page
Godzilla (1998)'s comments
Order by:
date added
votes
Info
In lists
(181)
Comments
(19)
Friends
Activity
Checks
(37886)
Favorites
(284)
Add your comment
Do you want to let us know what
you
think? Just
login
, after which you will be redirected back here and you can leave your comments.
Comments
1 - 15
of
19
Siskoid
I broke my rule against watching Roland Emmerich movies with 1998's Godzilla, a film I do not believe I'd ever managed to get through before. And boy, it was worse than I remembered/imagined. Let's get the whole "that's not Godzilla" conversation out of the way first. I would not mind a redesign (this one is a mutated iguana) if it still acted like Godzilla, or played Godzilla's iconic role. It doesn't. It's the T-Rex from Jurassic Park, running after individual humans, and its babies are ineffectual velociraptors (I mean, they snap at people but never bite them because... no reason or impediment). Emmerich has no CLUE what Godzilla is about. For him, it's an excuse for his trademark destruction porn, and yet, the military destroys more landmarks than the monster ever does. Plot holes abound in this thing, and Godzilla uses it to get from point A to point B instead of sensical geography. He's spawned in the Pacific, but shows up in New York. He's Batman, able to double back behind helicopters and hide in plain sight and no one ever notices. In fact, they keep losing this monster that's as big as a building in New York's sewers and subway system. It's just dumb as rocks. Maybe worm expert Matthew Broderick can explain; he's got a good handle on crypto-lizard behavior too. There's really no caring for the character subplots, boring, cliché-laden, screaming cartoons, some very badly acted indeed (Vicki Lewis is an early offender). There's an extended revenge riff against Siskel and Ebert, likely for their having panned earlier films, and along with YET ANOTHER instance of throwing the French under the bus (like in ID4), it makes me think Emmerich is a vindictive director indeed. Tonally, this boring, over-long turd also gets low marks, with uplifting "wonderment" music over images that should inspire terror, and making Godzilla look pitiful in its death throes before everyone starts cheering its demise. It feels sadistic, but of course, there's no intent behind it. Emmerich has no control over his intent, beyond spectacle. And that brings us to the CG. Wow. 1998 was too early for a full-CG creature to rampage in New York during a rain storm. It's awful even for its time, with low integration of live action and visual effects. It's a long 130 minutes to get to the only good thing about this flick - Puff Daddy's "Come with Me" track. But I can find that on its own somewhere, right?
4 years 4 months ago
Thewatcher
There were a lot of fish in this movie and nothing else nor story nor logic.
13 years 1 month ago
Caravellos
Being a huge Gojira fan, I'm disappointed. Really, it should have been named Jurassic Park: Manhattan. The movie could have held it's own since it had some pretty cool CGI scenes, but defacing such a popular franchise doomed it to fail.
11 years 8 months ago
textbooktypo
If this movie wasn't called Godzilla, it wouldn't be as hated as it is.
As a Godzilla movie, it is horrible. As a typical giant monster movie, it's mediocre.
12 years 8 months ago
frankqb
One of the few films I've seen in theatres that made me want to scream in rage at its awfulness. Just a miserable and drawn-out film.
13 years 11 months ago
akuma587
I knew this was a bad film even when I was like 12.
13 years 1 month ago
danielbosloper
That's a lot of fish
13 years 2 months ago
Spinx
GOJIRA! GOJIRA! GOJIRA!
13 years 4 months ago
jerichoholic
What a clichéd movie.
13 years 5 months ago
Shaunage
I loved it back then. Probably not a good idea to rewatch it.
13 years 10 months ago
goellnerd
The best part was when they blew up MSG. I like to imagine they then rebuilt the old Penn Station
1 year 5 months ago
Malena
what a flop....
11 years 11 months ago
dpanter
Matthew Broderick is worthless again and ruins yet another movie.
12 years 9 months ago
tomsalad
I kinda liked it when I was 14...what was I thinking??? So incredibly boring.
13 years 11 months ago
ceejaybac
I really liked this movie when I was a kid. Now, it just seems too overdone, like they we trying to pull a best picture nominee out of a genre film.
14 years 1 month ago
Pages
1
2
Next
Showing items 1 – 15 of 19
View comments
Add your comment
Comments 1 - 15 of 19
Siskoid
I broke my rule against watching Roland Emmerich movies with 1998's Godzilla, a film I do not believe I'd ever managed to get through before. And boy, it was worse than I remembered/imagined. Let's get the whole "that's not Godzilla" conversation out of the way first. I would not mind a redesign (this one is a mutated iguana) if it still acted like Godzilla, or played Godzilla's iconic role. It doesn't. It's the T-Rex from Jurassic Park, running after individual humans, and its babies are ineffectual velociraptors (I mean, they snap at people but never bite them because... no reason or impediment). Emmerich has no CLUE what Godzilla is about. For him, it's an excuse for his trademark destruction porn, and yet, the military destroys more landmarks than the monster ever does. Plot holes abound in this thing, and Godzilla uses it to get from point A to point B instead of sensical geography. He's spawned in the Pacific, but shows up in New York. He's Batman, able to double back behind helicopters and hide in plain sight and no one ever notices. In fact, they keep losing this monster that's as big as a building in New York's sewers and subway system. It's just dumb as rocks. Maybe worm expert Matthew Broderick can explain; he's got a good handle on crypto-lizard behavior too. There's really no caring for the character subplots, boring, cliché-laden, screaming cartoons, some very badly acted indeed (Vicki Lewis is an early offender). There's an extended revenge riff against Siskel and Ebert, likely for their having panned earlier films, and along with YET ANOTHER instance of throwing the French under the bus (like in ID4), it makes me think Emmerich is a vindictive director indeed. Tonally, this boring, over-long turd also gets low marks, with uplifting "wonderment" music over images that should inspire terror, and making Godzilla look pitiful in its death throes before everyone starts cheering its demise. It feels sadistic, but of course, there's no intent behind it. Emmerich has no control over his intent, beyond spectacle. And that brings us to the CG. Wow. 1998 was too early for a full-CG creature to rampage in New York during a rain storm. It's awful even for its time, with low integration of live action and visual effects. It's a long 130 minutes to get to the only good thing about this flick - Puff Daddy's "Come with Me" track. But I can find that on its own somewhere, right?Thewatcher
There were a lot of fish in this movie and nothing else nor story nor logic.Caravellos
Being a huge Gojira fan, I'm disappointed. Really, it should have been named Jurassic Park: Manhattan. The movie could have held it's own since it had some pretty cool CGI scenes, but defacing such a popular franchise doomed it to fail.textbooktypo
If this movie wasn't called Godzilla, it wouldn't be as hated as it is.As a Godzilla movie, it is horrible. As a typical giant monster movie, it's mediocre.
frankqb
One of the few films I've seen in theatres that made me want to scream in rage at its awfulness. Just a miserable and drawn-out film.akuma587
I knew this was a bad film even when I was like 12.danielbosloper
That's a lot of fishSpinx
GOJIRA! GOJIRA! GOJIRA!jerichoholic
What a clichéd movie.Shaunage
I loved it back then. Probably not a good idea to rewatch it.goellnerd
The best part was when they blew up MSG. I like to imagine they then rebuilt the old Penn StationMalena
what a flop....dpanter
Matthew Broderick is worthless again and ruins yet another movie.tomsalad
I kinda liked it when I was 14...what was I thinking??? So incredibly boring.ceejaybac
I really liked this movie when I was a kid. Now, it just seems too overdone, like they we trying to pull a best picture nominee out of a genre film.Showing items 1 – 15 of 19