Order by:

Add your comment

Do you want to let us know what you think? Just login, after which you will be redirected back here and you can leave your comments.

Comments 1 - 9 of 9

BareLolk's avatar

BareLolk

Better than the book.
7 years 11 months ago
V012's avatar

V012

I just love a happy ending
9 years 2 months ago
LarsC's avatar

LarsC

"Greatest Hits of Jesus (Medley)"
9 years 4 months ago
AaronWest's avatar

AaronWest

An odd tapestry of a film, but undeniably great.
One can clearly see the film's influence on Andrei Tarkovsky's Andrei Rublev - they are both of the same vein, in speaking.
9 years 3 months ago
mcmakattack's avatar

mcmakattack

The best adaptation of the story of Christ, and perhaps the best film from Pasolini. The director remarkably toes the line between realism and the fantastic. From the well-casted actors to the settings in Palestine, the images here reflect most vividly was the the subject time and place must have looked like. On the other hand, the beautiful cinematography evokes an awe-inspiring holiness, especially with the young Mother Mary.
5 days 12 hours ago
baraka92's avatar

baraka92

quote:
One of The Gospel According to Matthew’s special achievements is the way it finds a cinematic equivalent to the literary nature of the Sermon on the Mount, which fills three chapters of Matthew’s Gospel. It's widely regarded by biblical scholars not as a single speech originally given by Jesus on a single occasion, but as a collection of sayings and teachings that Jesus proclaimed on various occasions, probably repeatedly and in various forms, edited together into a single speech by the sacred writer.

In keeping with this, Pasolini likewise edits together his Sermon on the Mount sequence out of separate shots of Irazoqui proclaiming Jesus’ teaching at different times and places. The camera stays tight on Irazoqui’s face, keeping the edits relatively unobtrusive, just as they are in Matthew’s Gospel; of the differing circumstances or audiences that occasioned the various components that become the Sermon on the Mount we learn nothing in Matthew, and therefore Pasolini shows us nothing of them. Only the cuts themselves, along with varying backgrounds and lighting conditions, indicate that we are experiencing a continuity created in the editing room.

The score includes some curious choices, ranging from Mozart and Bach to blues. One could imagine The Gospel According to Matthew with no music at all, just as Carl Dreyer wanted The Passion of Joan of Arc to play. Yet I think Christian film writer Seth Studer has a point when he argues in his review of the film, "Surprisingly, the soundtrack only adds to the film’s spiritual authenticity. By not confining itself to one style or era, the music invokes afresh the transcendence of Christ across the ages, across cultures."


Full review.
Amidst the string of jokes in here, I felt the need to share some genuine insight on this film.
1 year ago
Shingwauk's avatar

Shingwauk

The movie was an interesting adaptation. I could have done without the uni-brow, it was too distracting.
8 years 8 months ago
nicolaskrizan's avatar

nicolaskrizan

angry and hurried
12 years ago
View comments