Order by:

Add your comment

Do you want to let us know what you think? Just login, after which you will be redirected back here and you can leave your comments.

Comments 1 - 15 of 24

Apache's avatar

Apache

People love to hate this one. This is probably my favorite Bond movie. Complete revenge flick to it's core.
6 years ago
demagogo's avatar

demagogo

(removed by mod: please post in English)
8 years 3 months ago
Dieguito's avatar

Dieguito

Terrible Bond
12 years 6 months ago
Zeltaebar's avatar

Zeltaebar

Casino Royale was great and I eagerly anticipated the sequal.... Words can not explain what a piece of crap this shit is. Was there no quality control?
12 years 10 months ago
Malena's avatar

Malena

the worst Bond movie......
12 years 11 months ago
Hasturion's avatar

Hasturion

I went in with very low expectations and was pleasantly surprised.
Yes the actions scenes are nigh unreadable due to shaky cams, feverish editing and unclear geography of the action, and the movie is even more devoid of gadgets as his direct predecessor, and the plot is at times needlessly convoluted.

However, It was overall satisfied: it still is a bond movie with setpieces set in gorgeous real world locations, and the good surprise is the underlying commentary. Bond movies, even when they are rather serious in tone like casino royale, feel like sleek escapist affairs, disconnected from the real world.
Here we have a reflection of documented policies regarding the often disgusting collusion of capitalism and secret services through regime changes. Even the monopolization of water mirrors the actions of coca cola in mexico.
I wasn't expecting that much commitment to political commentary from a bond movie, and I'm the kind of viewer who responds well to that even though the ending doesn't give it too much payoff.
Amalric is a perfect sleazeball as greene: he's even more of a finance nerd as le chiffre was in the previous movie, and as a result, he's not as charismatic or menacing, but his entanglement with other intelligence agencies causes bond enough hardship to make him interesting, even he's not much in a face to face fight.

Craig as bond feels like there is a character rather than just a vessel for the viewer to imagine themselves womanizing and kicking ass, and returning characters support that emotional throughline with the previous movie. this bond is violent and vengeful, he's got a lack of restraints that have real consequences for him and others.
2 years 5 months ago
Joker of Gotham's avatar

Joker of Gotham

The first was better, but the third will be great, and hopefully better than the first
3.5/5
11 years 3 months ago
attie pattie's avatar

attie pattie

the name is Bond, Bluescreen Bond
12 years 1 month ago
jpesce's avatar

jpesce

Crap.
13 years 4 months ago
Scratch47's avatar

Scratch47

Boring, drab, and uninspired. Like an empty 'Licence To Kill'...avoid.
13 years 6 months ago
aphyrnae's avatar

aphyrnae

Didn't see Casino Royal, but I found Quantum of Solace a great dissapoint indeed...
13 years 11 months ago
Cinematiamo's avatar

Cinematiamo

A great disappointment after the great Casino Royal!
14 years 1 month ago
Siskoid's avatar

Siskoid

You can't beat Casino Royale - it was the origin story - so no, Quantum isn't quite as strong, but I'm not sure I would condemn it on the basis that it's a return to older Bonds. It continues on directly from Casino, and Daniel Craig gives them same kind of performance. It's the logical follow-up. So I liked it, even if I wasn't blown away (takes a lot for stunt work to really take me aback... which Casino did at least once).
7 years 5 months ago
Maikol's avatar

Maikol

The worst Bond movie with Daniel Craig, the worst Bond movie ever made, even any of Torrente film was more sexy than this crap.
8 years 11 months ago

Showing items 1 – 15 of 24

View comments