Check
- Mark movie as favorite
- Dislike this movie
- Add movie to watchlist
- Mark movie as owned
- Check movie
- View the official lists that include The Thief of Bagdad
- Visit IMDb page
The Thief of Bagdad (1940)'s comments
Order by:
- Info
- In lists (368)
- Comments (10)
- Friends
- Activity
- Checks (3081)
- Favorites (167)
Add your comment
Comments 1 - 10 of 10
Siskoid
1940's The Thief of Bagdad, though a remake of a 1924 silent film, stands out as the main source material for Disney's Aladdin, if only on account of the villain being a sorcerer called Jaffar. The movie nevertheless splits the Aladdin role in two, with John Justin playing the fallen prince who must save the kingdom and the princess, and Sabu as the thief who finds a genie in a bottle (a genie more green than blue, but same difference). As special effects spectaculars go, The Thief of Bagdad surprises with its cutting-edge use of chromakey, a technique that wouldn't be put into wide use for decades (and is far from perfected here), and provides a lot of neat fantastical images, at least eventually. The magic doesn't really kick in until the second act. Evoking later movies like the Sinbad film Harryhausen worked on, it stands as a fun enough fantasy family film, a storybook come to life in vivid Technicolor. The plot is all over the place, but in the best fairy tale way.geppetto
Sultan Jaffar (Conrad Veidt) is the most intelligent ,original ,stylish ,magical and greatest villian ever.deckard.
the movie considerably loses it pace during that drawn out djinn sequence, but all in all a good flick. but no way near better than the errol flynn version.conrad veidt just owns btw. what an actor.
Blikoponeindig
https://youtu.be/8upoPFafJqQ (HD quality-1080p).Ronet
Thank you, but our princess is in another castle! Probably the first bromance movie.ClassicLady
That genie's toenails and fingernails really creeped me out! Otherwise, wonderful clarity, color, and detail.daisyaday
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7ov6vzDieguito
Really, best cinematography this studio movie?? I've preferred the silent version.tommy_leazaq
The 1924 version was way betterWindill
It's a 1001 nights-type story. Part of the movie aged well, part of it didn't. Would deserve an update with modern effects and less racism.