Ahead of it's time. Identity theft and hacking are both a major concern, especially in the digital age. Interesting to see them covered 30 years ago.
Sandra's character was pretty smart at times and capable of defending herself, which was refreshing to see. Not something I'd watch again, especially since it was more of a typical thriller, but the premise was definitely unique (for the time, anyway).
It's definitely a slow burn. It requires patience, which (in my opinion) is well rewarded. It feels like a dream, or a nightmare in this case. Very unique and definitely left me feeling quite unsettled.
I'm confused by the comments, though. The one who said "Literally nothing happens" doesn't make sense, because a lot happens in this film. It's more than whispers and cartoons, and it's certainly not a found footage film like Blair Witch.
The first half was quite generic and unmemorable (and contained a few too many embarrassing/cringey moments), but the second half (starting around the blue soup scene) was very enjoyable and contained a few laugh-out-loud moments. If the whole film was like that, then it definitely would've been one of my favourite romcoms. As it stands, though...it's fine, but not great.
Since Siskoid didn't use spoiler tags, I thought I'd point out: Honestly, I don't think Isabel was telling the truth. This film could very well be about drug addiction, especially when you notice the huge amount of plotholes if Utopia really did exist.
I prefer it as a metaphor, but others may not. It's rather open-ended so take what you want from it. Either way, I quite enjoyed it and thought that both leads were fantastic, especially Owen Wilson.
Very intriguing. I went in knowing nothing about it, and came out in awe. The attention to detail was outstanding, the acting was great and there are plenty of hidden details that make it worth rewatching just to find them
spot the killer!
.
Very unnerving, and Sigourney was absolutely phenomenal. I've never seen Harry Connick Jr in anything before (unless Iron Giant counts) so I was amazed at how good he was at acting. He did a great job at being both creepy and insane.
My only real gripe was with Holly Hunter's character, especially her lack of empathy for the first half of the film. I found her character quite annoying for that duration, especially her constant bashing of Helen and her condition.
Other than that, it was great.
If you find the ending
too bleak, just remember that his mail would've been read, and he most likely would've been barred from sending/receiving mail...plus the recipient would've likely been investigated. It makes the ending more amusing that bleak, although it still leaves you with the thought that there will always be more copycats regardless.
Funny and rather unpredictable. Jenny was phenomenal.
It was very enjoyable and genuinely good...until the last 20 minutes or so (whenever the boat scene begins). It then becomes unnecessarily painful and hard to watch, for all of the wrong reasons. It was obvious from the beginning of that scene that they were planning on having one of those clichéd
reveal
scenes where
their lie is dramatically revealed and it ends with someone being punched
. It began to pick back up after that, and when it reached the
airplane
scene it seemed like it had found it's groove again...and then it ended.
The
reveal scene never needed to happen. They both could have told their partners (and/or exes) the truth, in private, and then it could have focused on them realising their feelings for each other. Or maybe that before telling them the truth.
Part of the problem is how suddenly out-of-character Peter is after Anne calls him back. He doesn't care what Emma did or how she did it. He basically just throws money at her, says "k thx bye" and then runs off. He leaps into Anne's arms and then the next day he says a quick thanks to Emma and a rather insincere "sorry I failed" before telling her that he's not going to hang out with her ever again. Dick move.
He then proceeds to botch his breakup with Anne and then confess his love to Emma right in front of her (and everyone else). It's so strange that a guy that's supposed to be so nice and sensitive can be such a cruel jerk when he's in love. Which one is the real him?
Peter should've broken it off with Anne on the boat like how she dumped him at the birthday party (but in a less douchey way), so she would've realised how shitty it felt. Emma could've realised that Logan wasn't right for her, and broken it off on the boat. Then Peter could've confessed to Emma IN PRIVATE, she would've said too late, and then she could've had a talk with Noah about why how she wanted him back before realising that they weren't compatible. After that, the airplane scene could've happened. It sounds similar, but for a film that somehow wasn't painful (despite the subject material and scenes that had plenty of potential to be very painful), that one scene was cringe-inducing enough to sour the ending somewhat.
Yes, it was deceitful, but did the exes really need to know? Real life is complicated and isn't always black-and-white. They didn't have to know.
Noah got married because of Peter (who also helped him more than hindering him) and Emma saved Anne from fully committing to a guy who didn't respect her or their relationship...and was making her feel like she had to be someone she wasn't. If Peter broke it off and both him and Emma fully moved on from their exes, then why did they both need to know the truth? Because drama, I guess.
It should have kept focusing on growth and realising that they were better off without their exes. That is something that happened in the film, but it was in a really overly messy and abrupt way.
I'll probably watch it again, but I just wish that that scene was handled better.
Beautiful cinematography and a haunting soundtrack. I feel like the second half wasn't as powerful or engaging as the first, but overall it was quite the unique ride. The two leads (Jessie and Rory) were absolutely brilliant.
Decent film with good acting from the lead, but not the greatest adaptation. Charles is quite the dick in this one (especially to Alice) and his intelligence is treated as a huge burden. The side effects were also a strange addition.
Murdering Algernon (who is female in this one) was also bizarre, especially when it was never brought up by anyone afterwards.
It barely touched on empathy, trauma or any of the other themes present in the book. The moral appears to simply be "ignorance is bliss" and "be happy with what you have".
A good film and pretty great adaptation, but the music is often jarring and even drowns out talking at various points. The second half handles it better, but still stumbles at times.
The other problem is that the lessons on empathy and compassion are both downplayed in here compared to the book. Dally in particular stands out, as he's more aggressive with Johnny which makes
his grief
later on hit less hard. Randy says he's tired of it all, but
he never talks about leaving or avoiding the brawl
. Less emphasis is put on the similarities between the two gangs, in terms of how they're just people. Even Darry's dilemma takes a backseat, as he seems more content with not going to college and with being poor.
In short: it's good, but not as good as it could have been.
Enjoyable in a comedic sense. Frustrating in a realistic sense. Torgo summed it up perfectly.
The only thing I would critique is the ending. It was beautiful right up until
it showed the spaceship leaving earth as it was destroyed. That alone killed some of the emotional vibes it was trying to elicit, but then it continued and dived completely into comedy. It was incredibly jarring and should've been cut. I think if people knew the president was leaving on a spaceship, then they probably would've been able to put two and two together and realised that she would be killed on another planet. Or maybe I'm just being too optimistic.
I find some of the comments here to be quite baffling.
In response to some of them:
1. The film only focuses on two characters, but mainly on one. If you're having difficulty with following 1-2 characters then I'm not sure that the film is to blame.
2. There is a plot. It's there from the very beginning and plods steadily along throughout the entire film.
3. It's strange to label this as a misanthropic film when it also went out of it's way to show the side of humanity worth saving. It was pretty clear in that area.
4. If you dislike 90% of the characters despite them being varied, then that's not the problem of the film.
5. If you sided with the scientists and were yelling at the screen wanting the officials and public to just DO SOMETHING, then congrats, you got the point of the film.
6. It's not about COVID. You missed the point of the film entirely.
Surprisingly good, especially considering that it was based on a video game. Not too much action, not too cliched, with some very funny jokes. Adults and children alike should get a kick out of it.
The scenes with Jim Carrey and Adam Pally were the best parts. Oddly enough, the scenes heavily featuring Sonic (especially the bar scenes) were the least funny and the least interesting. At least to me, anyway.
A good take on how people often trivialise trauma and rarely take PTSD seriously. Also a pretty good take on why having kids is a bad idea, depending on your take on Chris.
Personally, I thought that Chris was such a horrid person that it was impossible to root for her or sympathise with her in any way.
Sandra Oh was fantastic.
I didn't find the film even remotely scary; it was more like a suspenseful drama.
Although this film isn't about grief, I found that it reminded me of The Babadook. That film is vastly superior, however.
The first half was quite spooky. The second half had interesting effects, but dropped most of the scares.
Felt like it should've been two different films, to be honest.
There's so much potential here. So much wasted potential.
Firstly, the lead actress is phenomenal. Despite
not having a single line of dialogue
, she's able to captivate the viewer with a single look. She manages to be both alluring and terrifying.
Secondly, the atmosphere and cinematography are both fantastic. It's a beautiful looking film and the rising tension is captured perfectly.
Thirdly, the soundtrack is great. It really complements the film and doesn't get in the way.
So what's the issue, then?
Three things:
1. The male actors, especially the lead. While the actor who played the brother was the weakest link, the lead was just not convincing. The only thing he really pulled off was legitimately looking like he had anaemia, but I'm not sure that can be credited to his acting skills.
2. The lengthy sex scenes. Were two long and gratuitous sex scenes really needed here? Did they add anything to the story? Because I'm certain that the film would've progressed just fine without them. In fact, it probably would've benefited greatly from it.
3. The script. From the dialogue to the plot, so much of it was unnecessary and so much of it needed tweaking.
Were the two conversations with the motel manager really needed? Was it truly necessary to hear multiple topics
(can the dead come back to life, the dead can come back to life, "stop tormenting our mother", "you're a deadbeat flake", etc.
over and over again to advance the plot?
That aside, the plot itself is both a mess and in dire need of fixing. If the focus was put upon the sister and less upon the brother, and if the tone was more of an atmospheric horror
keep the basic premise of him mysteriously finding her (without the pod), bringing her home and introducing her to his family/girlfriend. Have the audience trying to figure out who (or what) she is (imposter? inhuman? imaginary?) and ramp up the creep factor. Have her all "normal" and cheery with him, but...off when alone with anyone else.
than a drama with horror elements, then this would've been an incredible film.
It has nearly all of the pieces to be something truly fantastic, but the few missing pieces are so necessary and so glaring that the film just doesn't work. It's such a shame.
I also have mixed feelings, but for different reasons.
The acting is fantastic (especially by Kate Winslet, but no surprise there), the characters are fascinating and there is a lot of character development. The pace is good and steady, the music isn't intrusive and the cinematography is quite nice.
However...
Some "clues" ranged from being pretty obvious to straight up in your face. There was too much handholding, to the point of being dumbed-down at times...and then the viewer is also expected to believe various plot holes and questionable events
such as Zabel's death. It wasn't a huge shocker given the multiple indicators, but HOW he died is what's shocking. This dude just quick draws and pops him in the head with lightning speed? Just like that? Zabel already had his gun out and was just about to shoot him, yet this random guy was able to whip his gun out and shoot him with deadly accuracy? Faster and more efficient than a trained officer? K.
, even when they're skimmed over or aren't fully explained. At the very end everything isn't neatly wrapped up, which isn't always a bad thing but in this programme it's noticeable. There are a few questions left that could've quickly and easily been answered, and would've made it more (for lack of a better word) immersive.
Or maybe I'm just picky after being spoiled by Sharp Objects.
That being said, it was a great ride and I don't regret watching it. In fact, knowing what I know now might actually make a second viewing more enjoyable. I don't have to focus on "whodunnit" and instead just enjoy the brilliant performances.
It's not what I thought it'd be, which unfortunately for me is a bad thing.
From what I had seen and heard, I thought that it would've been a film about a couple trapped in "the backrooms", with weird and creepy things happening to them as they desperately tried to escape.
If I had known that the majority of the film was actually
a loving couple being forced to raise a creepy annoying alien child (with the backrooms as more of a backdrop, as most of the film takes place in the yard, car and inside the house), only to die horrifically at the end
then I probably wouldn't have watched it.
It's very niche, that's for sure. If the acting wasn't so incredible (especially from Imogen Poots) then I don't know if I would've sat through the whole thing. The concept of applying an animal behaviour that becames barbaric when it's applied to humans is fascinating, but in the film it often toes the line between being monotonous and being incredibly draining. It's just so...bleak.
I'd recommend watching episodes 1-11 before calling it a day. 11 is the perfect end, and only goes downhill from there.
I'd also like to point out that while the beginning is relatively accurate in portraying autism, after episode 11 it begins to drop the ball. Autistic people can cope under pressure, they aren't cold-hearted assholes and they do not lack empathy. Although the beginning is great at showing that autistic people can and do handle the same jobs as NT people, after 11 it instead shows that apparently even an autistic savant will crack under pressure and from too much stimuli.
I have many other issues with this show, but that is the biggest one for me. It's telling people that autistic people can never succeed, at least not at the same level as neurotypicals. And that is a completely damaging lie.
Awesome cinematography and incredible tension. I don't know if it's a film that I'd watch again (as the suspense would be dampened due to knowing all of the twists), but it was a great ride.
Not really a spoiler, but
there is no gore (which may be a turnoff for some). A bit of blood, but nearly everything happens off-camera. I personally prefer it when something violent is hinted at rather than shown. If anything, it only adds to the suspense.
I mention this as some people were disappointed by the lack of gore and others were relieved. Depends on the person.
I know that this film is referred to as a "Trump horror film" (which may put off those who aren't wanting to watch a political film), but that's not entirely accurate. The director himself has said that it's more a commentary on the state of mental health in the US. This isn't a spoiler as it's apparent right from the very beginning and all throughout the film.
Joe reaches out many times and is ignored or blown off every single time. Does it excuse what he did? Absolutely not, but no one can deny that the signs were there. If she had only listened to him then maybe he could've received the help that he desperately needed. Maybe he was already passed the point of no return, but the ending could've been avoided.
Regardless, I really enjoyed it. I'm glad that I ignored the IMDB rating, or else I would've passed on a great gem. I hope that others will give it a chance, too. Just go in blind and with no expectations. That's what I did, and it turned out to be a pleasant surprise.
Comments 1 - 25 of 109
Movie comment on The Net
yukononun
Ahead of it's time. Identity theft and hacking are both a major concern, especially in the digital age. Interesting to see them covered 30 years ago.Sandra's character was pretty smart at times and capable of defending herself, which was refreshing to see. Not something I'd watch again, especially since it was more of a typical thriller, but the premise was definitely unique (for the time, anyway).
Movie comment on Dazed and Confused
yukononun
Despite being set in the 1970's, it still somehow sums up society perfectly. This is either a good or a bad thing depending on your perspective.Movie comment on Skinamarink
yukononun
It's definitely a slow burn. It requires patience, which (in my opinion) is well rewarded. It feels like a dream, or a nightmare in this case. Very unique and definitely left me feeling quite unsettled.I'm confused by the comments, though. The one who said "Literally nothing happens" doesn't make sense, because a lot happens in this film. It's more than whispers and cartoons, and it's certainly not a found footage film like Blair Witch.
It's obviously not for everyone, but I liked it.
Movie comment on Bridget Jones's Diary
yukononun
The first half was quite generic and unmemorable (and contained a few too many embarrassing/cringey moments), but the second half (starting around the blue soup scene) was very enjoyable and contained a few laugh-out-loud moments. If the whole film was like that, then it definitely would've been one of my favourite romcoms. As it stands, though...it's fine, but not great.Movie comment on Bliss
yukononun
Since Siskoid didn't use spoiler tags, I thought I'd point out: Honestly, I don't think Isabel was telling the truth. This film could very well be about drug addiction, especially when you notice the huge amount of plotholes if Utopia really did exist.I prefer it as a metaphor, but others may not. It's rather open-ended so take what you want from it. Either way, I quite enjoyed it and thought that both leads were fantastic, especially Owen Wilson.
Movie comment on Copycat
yukononun
Very intriguing. I went in knowing nothing about it, and came out in awe. The attention to detail was outstanding, the acting was great and there are plenty of hidden details that make it worth rewatching just to find themVery unnerving, and Sigourney was absolutely phenomenal. I've never seen Harry Connick Jr in anything before (unless Iron Giant counts) so I was amazed at how good he was at acting. He did a great job at being both creepy and insane.
If you find the ending
Movie comment on I Want You Back
yukononun
Funny and rather unpredictable. Jenny was phenomenal.It was very enjoyable and genuinely good...until the last 20 minutes or so (whenever the boat scene begins). It then becomes unnecessarily painful and hard to watch, for all of the wrong reasons. It was obvious from the beginning of that scene that they were planning on having one of those clichéd
The
Part of the problem is how suddenly out-of-character Peter is after Anne calls him back. He doesn't care what Emma did or how she did it. He basically just throws money at her, says "k thx bye" and then runs off. He leaps into Anne's arms and then the next day he says a quick thanks to Emma and a rather insincere "sorry I failed" before telling her that he's not going to hang out with her ever again. Dick move.
He then proceeds to botch his breakup with Anne and then confess his love to Emma right in front of her (and everyone else). It's so strange that a guy that's supposed to be so nice and sensitive can be such a cruel jerk when he's in love. Which one is the real him?
Peter should've broken it off with Anne on the boat like how she dumped him at the birthday party (but in a less douchey way), so she would've realised how shitty it felt. Emma could've realised that Logan wasn't right for her, and broken it off on the boat. Then Peter could've confessed to Emma IN PRIVATE, she would've said too late, and then she could've had a talk with Noah about why how she wanted him back before realising that they weren't compatible. After that, the airplane scene could've happened. It sounds similar, but for a film that somehow wasn't painful (despite the subject material and scenes that had plenty of potential to be very painful), that one scene was cringe-inducing enough to sour the ending somewhat.
Yes, it was deceitful, but did the exes really need to know? Real life is complicated and isn't always black-and-white. They didn't have to know.
Noah got married because of Peter (who also helped him more than hindering him) and Emma saved Anne from fully committing to a guy who didn't respect her or their relationship...and was making her feel like she had to be someone she wasn't. If Peter broke it off and both him and Emma fully moved on from their exes, then why did they both need to know the truth? Because drama, I guess.
It should have kept focusing on growth and realising that they were better off without their exes. That is something that happened in the film, but it was in a really overly messy and abrupt way.
I'll probably watch it again, but I just wish that that scene was handled better.
Movie comment on Inunaki mura
yukononun
Some creepy moments, but (largely thanks to the music and effects) generally felt more like a thriller than a horror.Movie comment on Men
yukononun
Beautiful cinematography and a haunting soundtrack. I feel like the second half wasn't as powerful or engaging as the first, but overall it was quite the unique ride. The two leads (Jessie and Rory) were absolutely brilliant.Movie comment on Des fleurs pour Algernon
yukononun
Decent film with good acting from the lead, but not the greatest adaptation. Charles is quite the dick in this one (especially to Alice) and his intelligence is treated as a huge burden. The side effects were also a strange addition.It barely touched on empathy, trauma or any of the other themes present in the book. The moral appears to simply be "ignorance is bliss" and "be happy with what you have".
Movie comment on The Outsiders
yukononun
A good film and pretty great adaptation, but the music is often jarring and even drowns out talking at various points. The second half handles it better, but still stumbles at times.The other problem is that the lessons on empathy and compassion are both downplayed in here compared to the book. Dally in particular stands out, as he's more aggressive with Johnny which makes
In short: it's good, but not as good as it could have been.
Movie comment on At Home by Myself... with You
yukononun
A lovely rom-com that accurately depicts living with phobias. Simple and sweet.Movie comment on Don't Look Up
yukononun
Enjoyable in a comedic sense. Frustrating in a realistic sense. Torgo summed it up perfectly.The only thing I would critique is the ending. It was beautiful right up until
I find some of the comments here to be quite baffling.
In response to some of them:
1. The film only focuses on two characters, but mainly on one. If you're having difficulty with following 1-2 characters then I'm not sure that the film is to blame.
2. There is a plot. It's there from the very beginning and plods steadily along throughout the entire film.
3. It's strange to label this as a misanthropic film when it also went out of it's way to show the side of humanity worth saving. It was pretty clear in that area.
4. If you dislike 90% of the characters despite them being varied, then that's not the problem of the film.
5. If you sided with the scientists and were yelling at the screen wanting the officials and public to just DO SOMETHING, then congrats, you got the point of the film.
6. It's not about COVID. You missed the point of the film entirely.
Movie comment on Sonic the Hedgehog
yukononun
Surprisingly good, especially considering that it was based on a video game. Not too much action, not too cliched, with some very funny jokes. Adults and children alike should get a kick out of it.The scenes with Jim Carrey and Adam Pally were the best parts. Oddly enough, the scenes heavily featuring Sonic (especially the bar scenes) were the least funny and the least interesting. At least to me, anyway.
Movie comment on Umma
yukononun
A good take on how people often trivialise trauma and rarely take PTSD seriously. Also a pretty good take on why having kids is a bad idea, depending on your take on Chris.Personally, I thought that Chris was such a horrid person that it was impossible to root for her or sympathise with her in any way.
Sandra Oh was fantastic.
I didn't find the film even remotely scary; it was more like a suspenseful drama.
Although this film isn't about grief, I found that it reminded me of The Babadook. That film is vastly superior, however.
Movie comment on The Night House
yukononun
The first half was quite spooky. The second half had interesting effects, but dropped most of the scares.Felt like it should've been two different films, to be honest.
Movie comment on Inspector Gadget
yukononun
The only good thing about it is how big of a simp Dr Claw is.Movie comment on Hell House LLC
yukononun
Very enjoyable. The climax was a bit of a letdownI wouldn't watch it again, but I definitely didn't regret seeing it.
Movie comment on Ayla
yukononun
There's so much potential here. So much wasted potential.Firstly, the lead actress is phenomenal. Despite
Secondly, the atmosphere and cinematography are both fantastic. It's a beautiful looking film and the rising tension is captured perfectly.
Thirdly, the soundtrack is great. It really complements the film and doesn't get in the way.
So what's the issue, then?
Three things:
1. The male actors, especially the lead. While the actor who played the brother was the weakest link, the lead was just not convincing. The only thing he really pulled off was legitimately looking like he had anaemia, but I'm not sure that can be credited to his acting skills.
2. The lengthy sex scenes. Were two long and gratuitous sex scenes really needed here? Did they add anything to the story? Because I'm certain that the film would've progressed just fine without them. In fact, it probably would've benefited greatly from it.
3. The script. From the dialogue to the plot, so much of it was unnecessary and so much of it needed tweaking.
Were the two conversations with the motel manager really needed? Was it truly necessary to hear multiple topics
That aside, the plot itself is both a mess and in dire need of fixing. If the focus was put upon the sister and less upon the brother, and if the tone was more of an atmospheric horror
It has nearly all of the pieces to be something truly fantastic, but the few missing pieces are so necessary and so glaring that the film just doesn't work. It's such a shame.
Movie comment on Creep
yukononun
I think with a bit of trimming (10-15 minutes?) and maybe a different song for the end credits then it would've been a masterpiece.It was enjoyable, though. Duplass was great as always.
Movie comment on Mare of Easttown
yukononun
I also have mixed feelings, but for different reasons.The acting is fantastic (especially by Kate Winslet, but no surprise there), the characters are fascinating and there is a lot of character development. The pace is good and steady, the music isn't intrusive and the cinematography is quite nice.
However...
Some "clues" ranged from being pretty obvious to straight up in your face. There was too much handholding, to the point of being dumbed-down at times...and then the viewer is also expected to believe various plot holes and questionable events
Or maybe I'm just picky after being spoiled by Sharp Objects.
That being said, it was a great ride and I don't regret watching it. In fact, knowing what I know now might actually make a second viewing more enjoyable. I don't have to focus on "whodunnit" and instead just enjoy the brilliant performances.
Movie comment on Vivarium
yukononun
It's not what I thought it'd be, which unfortunately for me is a bad thing.From what I had seen and heard, I thought that it would've been a film about a couple trapped in "the backrooms", with weird and creepy things happening to them as they desperately tried to escape.
If I had known that the majority of the film was actually
It's very niche, that's for sure. If the acting wasn't so incredible (especially from Imogen Poots) then I don't know if I would've sat through the whole thing. The concept of applying an animal behaviour that becames barbaric when it's applied to humans is fascinating, but in the film it often toes the line between being monotonous and being incredibly draining. It's just so...bleak.
Movie comment on The Good Doctor
yukononun
I'd recommend watching episodes 1-11 before calling it a day. 11 is the perfect end, and only goes downhill from there.I'd also like to point out that while the beginning is relatively accurate in portraying autism, after episode 11 it begins to drop the ball. Autistic people can cope under pressure, they aren't cold-hearted assholes and they do not lack empathy. Although the beginning is great at showing that autistic people can and do handle the same jobs as NT people, after 11 it instead shows that apparently even an autistic savant will crack under pressure and from too much stimuli.
I have many other issues with this show, but that is the biggest one for me. It's telling people that autistic people can never succeed, at least not at the same level as neurotypicals. And that is a completely damaging lie.
Movie comment on Tilt
yukononun
Awesome cinematography and incredible tension. I don't know if it's a film that I'd watch again (as the suspense would be dampened due to knowing all of the twists), but it was a great ride.Not really a spoiler, but
I mention this as some people were disappointed by the lack of gore and others were relieved. Depends on the person.
I know that this film is referred to as a "Trump horror film" (which may put off those who aren't wanting to watch a political film), but that's not entirely accurate. The director himself has said that it's more a commentary on the state of mental health in the US. This isn't a spoiler as it's apparent right from the very beginning and all throughout the film.
Regardless, I really enjoyed it. I'm glad that I ignored the IMDB rating, or else I would've passed on a great gem. I hope that others will give it a chance, too. Just go in blind and with no expectations. That's what I did, and it turned out to be a pleasant surprise.
Movie comment on The Collector
yukononun
Torture porn and features extremely gory scene involving a cat. Why that was considered necessary is completely beyond me.Showing items 1 – 25 of 109