nowhereman136's activity

A good first try from Shayamalan

6/10

This movie is so all over the place. There are definitely moments of actual comedy (shout out to Bill Burr and Thomas Lennon) but they are mixed in with a bunch of jokes that range from meh to cringeworthy. Overall i didnt hate it but i wouldnt recommend it or want to sit through it again

5/10

(No Spoiler) This film was riding high in my book up until the ending. I even liked the general story of the ending, but the visual choices left a bad taste.

Praise for relative newcomer Katy O'Brien, the first Oscar-worthy performance of 2024

why do i feel like this movie use to be much better before studio meddling turned it into the schlock we got on the screen

The guy who made this has an Oscar? Really?

I loved it, not quite as funny as the Paddington movies but still just as charming and creative

8/10

almost 2 hours of boring and then 2 minutes of "holy f***ng s**t!!"

6/10

This isn't a musical that will sway people who aren't musical fans. However, it's bright, fun, and flashy. The actors do a great job filling the shoes of their predecessors. And a lot of the jokes were new, it never felt like I was watching the original over again. Kinda dumb but still earnest and enjoyable

8/10

yeah its better than the last few saw movies but only because the others were so bad. This is far from being good and not even close to the original (2 and 3 were good too). What was nice was the linear story telling, which this franchise is use to ignoring to confusing effects, also the acting all around is pretty good.

heres the bad, the traps arent very creative, to even downright stupid. theres no mystery or twist. not even a puzzle to solve. It feels like Jigsaw had gotten so lazy setting up these traps this time around and on top of that

5/10

Did you like Black Panther 2, Antman 3, and Thor 4? if so, then you'll probably like this. Far from being a bad movie, its just more of the same from Marvel. If you are getting tired of these kind of movies, then this isnt going to change your opinion. But if you enjoy them or go in with managed expectations, then you'll like this movie fine

7/10

Wasnt great, wasnt terrible, right down the middle

6/10

Overall - 5/10

Spoiler Free - I like Waller-Bridge's character (and her sidekick). And I liked her dynamic with Indy. I also liked the opening action sequence. Aside from that the movie was really boring. The plot was boring, the action was boring, and the villain was boring. But worst of all, Indy was boring. I like Harrison Ford, he was great in Blade Runmer 2049 and Shrinking. But here he is just old and out of place. It felt like everything had to be toned down so that he can keep up. Frankly, I really wished they had recast him and done a James Bond thing of another non-sequential adventure film.

Spoiler - I don't like what they did with Shia LeBeouf's character. I hate when sequels completely ignore previous films character growth just so they can do it again. Mutt wasn't the greatest aspect of Crystal Skull but how they treated him here made it all pointless. And the time travel aspect falls into the same cliches of other timetravel movies. It was boring. Crystal Skull had plenty of issues, but at least it tried to be original

One of the best animated films of the year

9/10

X can't be the villain, that's way too obvious. The villain must be Y

(1 hour later)

Nope, X is the villain

4/10

Pixar's best romance since Wall•e. Funny, original, sweet, and another visually stunning film from the masters of CGI animation.

9/10